Stream at ESPAnet Conference in Warsaw, 7-9 September 2023
Convenors: Simone Scherger (University of Bremen) & Hannah Zagel (WZB Berlin)
Submit your abstract by 14 April 2023 through:
The relationship between welfare states and individual life courses is central to many social policy debates. Welfare states played an essential role in generating institutionalized life courses and establishing their structure in the first place. By means of transfers, rights and social services, modern welfare states are aiming to get life courses or employment trajectories ‘back on track’, i.e. to remedy disadvantageous states such as illness or poverty, or to prevent risks and disadvantageous transitions in the first place (e.g. through preventative healthcare, education or supporting continuous employment). The life course dimension of welfare states is constantly re-negotiated, with ‘new’ life course-relevant risks being ‘discovered’ (such as family-related employment interruptions or long-term care) and long-existing policies being reshaped (such as unemployment protection). Links between welfare states and life courses have been studied from different angles. Welfare state research has focused on the construction of risks and on how social policies address risks and needs. These risks and needs are often specific to certain life phases or connected to specific life course transitions. Life course research has often studied (patterns of) longer individual trajectories in education, work or family, and their interrelationships with welfare states. While concepts such as “normal biographies” describe how welfare states promote certain normative models of the life course, the detailed and complex resulting patterns are also analyzed in this line of research. Although the potential of social policies to intervene in or disrupt trajectories of cumulative disadvantage is often postulated, studies on the relationship between specific policies and their effects on trajectories are less common, not least because of the high demands on data and methods for addressing such questions. Longer-term effects of welfare state regulation on life courses can be studied in almost all policy areas, including education, labour market policies, reproduction policies, family policies, health policies, and pensions. The stream aims at examining the individual-level long-term goals and effects of welfare regulation more closely, while also considering how political discourse, different actors and welfare regulation relate to (actual or assumed) trajectories. We welcome papers dealing with but not limited to the following questions:
Lorraine Frisina Doetter, Delia González de Reufels, Kerstin Martens and Marianne Ulriksen
ABOUT THE SERIES
This series welcomes studies on the waves, ruptures and transformative periods of welfare state expansion and retrenchment globally, that is, across nation states and the world as well as across history since the inception of the modern Western welfare state in the nineteenth century. It takes a comprehensive and globalized perspective on social policy, and the approach will help to locate and explain episodes of retrenchment, austerity, and tendencies toward dewelfarization in particular countries, policy areas and/or social risk-groups by reference to prior, simultaneous or anticipated episodes of expansion or contraction in other countries, areas, and risks. One of the aims of this series is to address the different constellations that emerge between political and economic actors including international and intergovernmental organizations, political actors and bodies, and business enterprises. A better understanding of these dynamics improves the reader’s grasp of social policy making, social policy outputs and ultimately the outcomes of social policy.
CONTACT FOR PROPOSALS
Proposals can be sent to the series editors, or Palgrave editor Sharla Plant email@example.com.