I typically work on issues that are located at the intersection of the philosophy of language, epistemology, metaphysics, and meta-philosophy.
Topics of interest to me include predicates and rigidity, Kripkeanism, two-dimensional semantics, modal epistemology, thought experiments and conceptual analysis, metaphysical modality, armchair methods of philosophical enquiry, conceptual engineering and the like.
I have just begun a project on open texture; see below.
Much of my more recent work clusters around issues related to an externalist approach I call paradigm term semantics; see the section below.
More recently, I have developed an interest in conceptual engineering and its normative contentions that broadens my former work on conceptual analysis. See the section below.
This project figures as sub-project B05 "Open Texture as a Scource of Linguistic Creativity" in the CRC 1646 "Linguistic Creativity in Communication" which you find here. I pursue this project together with Julia Zakkou (HHU Düsseldorf) and in collaboration with Steffen Koch (Bielefeld).
Similar to vagueness, open texture is the indeterminacy we often find when we consider whether a predicate applies to a new (or newly considered) object: Does ‘sandwich’ apply to burritos (Ludlow 2014), does ‘money’ apply to bitcoin (Vecht 2020), do ‘intelligence’ and ‘creativity’ apply to generative AI systems? The straightforward answer appears to be: there is no fact of the matter here. Nothing in the established meaning of these predicates or the properties of these objects settles the application one way or the other – there is nothing for us to find out, we rather need to decide.
If this is right, then our language is beset by a widespread indeterminacy besides vagueness, and we should inquire into its nature, its grounds, and its wider consequences - such as its foundational role in the emergence of linguistic creativity.
Combining approaches from semantics, pragmatics, and meta-semantics, this is precisely what our project is doing. We proceed by relating the phenomenon of open texture to well-explored theoretical issues in the philosophy of language and linguistics, notably the role of semantic indecision and the impact of semantic externalism (metasemantics), the relation of open texture to standard vagueness (semantics), and the strategies for speakers to extend application via metaphorical extension/meaning transfer/loose use and to contextually negotiate meanings (pragmatics). We expect our approach to explain how open texture grounds a specific type of linguistic creativity, and to bring out how open texture fares vis-à-vis rival explanations of language’s power to accommodate apparent indeterminacy.
Conceptual analysis aims to solve philosophical problems by uncovering what key terms actually mean. Conceptual engineering rather focusses on ameliorating the meanings of these terms. Such an amelioration can concern diverse dimensions of evaluation – it can e.g. be representational, cognitive, practical, moral, and/or political.
Understood as a technique, conceptual engineering raises analytical issues, such as: What determines the meaning of a concept ‘F’, how can we tell how good ‘F’ fares along some pertinent dimension(s) of evaluation, how, if at all, can we intentionally change the meaning of a term already in use, and how can we justifiably balance representational goodness against political or moral aptness.
Understood as a methodology, conceptual engineering raises normative questions about the aims and methods of philosophy. Revisionist conceptual engineers insist that we move from philosophy understood as an essentially descriptivist venture inquiring “What is our concept of F?” to philosophy understood as a normative undertaking asking “What should our concept of F be?”.
My project explores the possibility, means and mechanisms of an intentional change in meaning. The main line of research, however, concerns the normative force and the methodological implications of conceptual engineering understood as a philosophical methodology, especially the ideas that theorists are obliged to ameliorate their concepts, and the revisionist idea that conceptual engineering supports a general shift from descriptive to normative questions when it comes to conceptual dealings in philosophy.
areas: metaphilosophy, normative methodology
status: One paper published with Inquiry. Presently, I'm working on two papers on conceptual engineering -- one on the importance of implementation (submitted) and one on conceptual engineering and linguistic relativity. More to come.
Unser Buch "Die dunkle Seite der Sprache. Wie Worte ausgrenzen, abwerten und manipulieren", geschrieben von Nikola Kompa, Tim Henning und mir, ist im März 2025 bei C.H.Beck erschienen.
Im Buch nehmen wir uns sechs sprachliche Phänomene vor - nämlich: Metaphern, generische Aussagen, Herabsetzungswörter, kommunkative Entmächtigung, Akkommodation, Lügen & Bullshitting - und erkunden die zugrundeliegenden Mechanismen in ihrer hellen und vor allem in ihrer dunklen Spielart.
Hier ein wenig Presseecho zum Buch. Viel Spaß!
This project is an ongoing concern of mine since about 2016. I deem it important: seeing that certain expressions are paradigm terms tells us much of how they work, and how we should treat them.
Paradigm terms are expressions whose application is governed by a specific relation and anchored in specific actual items or ‘paradigm(s)’. For illustration, think of how ‘is one meter long’ was set to apply to anything bearing is of the same length as to the actual prototype du metre, a metal bar stored in Paris. The semantics of a paradigm predicate ‘F’ is captured by its value structure <R, O@>, combining a relation R and a set of actual paradigms O@. A paradigm term ‘F’ with the value structure <R, O@> will apply to anything x anywhere bearing R to the F-paradigms in O@.
The research programme systematically explores the role and import of paradigm terms and their deceptively simple (meta-)semantics for vernacular and scientific language. Paradigm term semantics devises a novel way to realize the externalist conviction that linguistic meaning is regularly fixed by the world. It provides a unifying scheme for expressions as diverse as ‘is one meter long’, ‘is gold’ , ‘is a star’, ‘has been Tom-Sawyered’, and ‘is a revolution’, and it thereby brings out that the proper linguistic taxon is the category of paradigm terms, rather than the usually consider class of natural kind expressions. At the same time, paradigm term semantics solves classic problems for externalism, and it avoids committing to metaphysical essentialism in its semantic format.
This research has far reaching implications for a variety of intersecting issues across multiple areas of philosophy such as e.g. the philosophy of language (predicate meaning, rigidity, Kripkeanism, what form a two-dimensional semantics should take), epistemology (modal knowledge, conceptual knowledge, the interplay of conceptual and worldy factors in inquiry), and the philosophy of science (natural kind terms, scientific essentialism, conceptual structure in scientific theories).
organized by Christian Nimtz, Julia Zakkou & Steffen Koch
Bielefeld, Germany, September 18-19, 2025
with
The workshop engages with open texture as a linguistic phenomenon and its relation to other phenomena and indeterminacies in language.
You will find the program here (once it is finalized).
For registration, please contact cnimt@uni-bielefeld.de
The workshop is organized by project B05 of the CRC 1646 "Linguistic Creativity in Communication" - see here.
In 2025, the masterclass in philosophy will be given by Miranda Fricker (2025), and it will be organized by Lara Keuck and me.
The masterclass will take place from June 24-26, 2025
For more details, see our masterclass page here
Bielefeld, June 12th and 13th 2024
The workshop takes up a key issue in conceptual ethics & engineering: How can we intervene to change our language, and why should we do so?
Our discussion of this issue will combine perspectives from philosophy, psychology and linguistics.
Confirmed speakers are Delia Belleri (Lisbon), Leda Berio (Bochum), Fritz Günther (HU Berlin), Steffen Koch (Bielefeld), Gary Lupyan (Wisconsin-Madison), Eleonore Neufeld (UMass Amherst), and Christian Nimtz (Bielefeld).
You find all details and the programme here.
If you want to participate, please mail to Christian Nimtz
The workshop is supported by the DFG.
From June 26th to June 28th 2024, we will be having a masterclass with Matthieu Queloz (Bern) on his now book "The Ethics of Conceptualization".
The book concerns key aspects of conceptual ethics and conceptual engineering, starting from the authority question: Why should we grant certain concepts an authority over our lives - over how we think, and what we take as a reason for action?
The masterclass-website with all details can soon be found: here.
Everyone is welcome to attend, please register with Steffen Koch.
I have been taking part in the summer school organized by Kevin Reuter and Hanjo Glock (both UZH). Other people who will be there are Shaun Nichols (Cornell University), Rachel Sterken (University of Hongkong), Manuel Gustavo Isaac (UZH), Ethan Landes (UZH), Nicole Rathgeb (UZH), and Pascale Willemsen (UZH),
Here's the website.
Bielefeld is an active and lively environment for theoretical philosophy. For other workshops and events, past and present, see the website of our "research group theoretical philosophy".