Selection of two reviewers according to criteria of subject proximity and independence, appointment of the three-member examination committee by the doctoral committee
Requirement that the second review should be prepared independently of the first review
Assessment content: essentially assessment of research performance in international comparison, originality and quality always take precedence over quantity as assessment criteria
Subject-specific standards for publication-based doctorates and anchoring in doctoral degree regulations, identification of own contribution to publications
Disputation as a form of oral examination, assessment according to quality and originality, written doctoral performance should form the main subject of the final examination
Foundation stone for internationalization: doctoral theses can be written in English, supervisory discussions can be held in English, promotion of attendance at international conferences
Framework conditions that support the reconciliation of family and doctorate
Representation of the interests of doctoral candidates with an advisory function in university committees