The awards ceremony took place on 27 February 2019 at the Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Bielefeld. The laudation was given by Professor Jürgen Osterhammel.
Born on 17 May 1955 in Bergisch Gladbach
Studies, doctorate (1985) and habilitation (1994) at the University of Cologne
Since 1997: Professorship for Early Modern History at the University of Münster
2005 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz-Award of the DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft)
2007 Honorary degree of the École normale supérieure Lettres et Sciences humaines Lyon
2012 Innovation award 2012 of the federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia
Member of the Bavarian Academy of Sciences and Humanities, the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities, the Göttingen Academy of Sciences and Humanities and the North Rhine-Westphalian Academy of Sciences, Humanities and the Arts
Fellow of the British Academy
2017 Leipzig Book Fair Prize (non-fiction)and Sigmund Freud Prize for Scientific Prose for "Maria Theresia. Die Kaiserin in ihrer Zeit"
Barbara Stollberg-Rilinger is among the most distinguished scientists in her field. She is in possession of an outstanding intellectual inquisitiveness and has always sought to cross disciplinary boundaries. As a professor for Early Modern History at the University of Münster, she has received many awards for her ground-breaking work on the political significance of rituals, ceremonies and symbols in the early modern age.
With her cultural historical approach to political structures, she has opened up a new perspective within historical scholarship to the practices of power and the exercise of rule. This is not only relevant for historical science. In her books she has also brought the early modern age, an era normally strange to us, alive. She makes this era tangible for the reader without compromising the historical differences between then and now. Her two most well-known books, “The Emperor’s Old Clothes: Constitutional History and the Symbolic Language of the Holy Roman Empire” and “Maria Theresa. The Empress in her Times” impressively demonstrate that the so-called “pre-modern” was not pre-modern, rather it dealt with its problems differently, but no less rationally. These two volumes are the crowning achievement of her opus, which she developed in a large number of individual studies and presented in the exhibition "Spectacle of Power. Rituals in Old Europe 800-1800”.
Barbara Stollberg-Rillinger has always looked beyond the boundaries of her own discipline. Inspired by Luhmann’s differentiation of interaction, organization and society she described the Early Modern society as a system in which decisions required presence, and for which dynamics of interaction played a significant role. Awarded the Leibniz Prize in 2005, she used the prize money for a project that investigated the characteristics of pre-modern procedures with the help of Luhmann’s procedural theory.
This is yet another reason why Barbara Stollberg-Rilinger is a worthy winner of a prize that is awarded in memory of a great sociologist who never allowed himself to be discouraged by ingrained intellectual and disciplinary boundaries.
This is yet another reason why Barbara Stollberg-Rilinger is a worthy winner of a prize that is awarded in memory of a great sociologist who also resisted traditional intellectual pathways and disciplinary boundaries.
The award ceremony took place on 15 November 2016 in the Kunsthalle Bielefeld (Art Museum Bielefeld).
The laudation "Democracy is history - Pierre Rosanvallon's analysis of modern democracy with practical intention" was delivered by Professor Lutz Raphael.
The awardee himself gave a lecture on " La démocratie du XXIe siècle".
Pierre Rosanvallon, a great democracy theorist of international standing, is the recipient of this year's Bielefeld Science Award, which is presented in memory of Niklas Luhmann. Rosanvallon (born 1948), professor of modern and contemporary history at the Collège de France, often and not without justification has also been referred to as a philosopher or political scientist. Above all, he has dedicated his research to the critical review and contemporary redefinition of the great guiding principles of the political, social and economic order. His books on democracy, representation, electoral law and majority of rule, sovereignty, equality, the welfare state, and the market, form an impressive body of work that has been translated into numerous languages and has become a trailblazer for determining the current state and further development of democracy. His public engagement as praiseworthy as his scientific output, notably through the creation of "La République des idées", an "international workshop" or think tank for the intellectual re-foundation of France and Europe, and the website "La vie des idées", which aims to provide high-quality information on the ideological foundations of politics going beyond the narrow field of scholars and intellectuals to engage the general public.
The award ceremony took place on 4 November 2014 at the Kunsthalle Bielefeld (Bielefeld Art Museum).
The laudation was delivered by Professor Kärin Nickelsen.
The award winner herself gave a lecture on “Self-interest and the Divided Self. From the Enlightenment to the Cold War".
In awarding the prize to Professor Daston, the jury honours one of the world's leading proponents of the history of science. Daston’s work has had a significant impact on the history of science in recent decades. Its focus, in particular, is on epistemological and ontological categories that shape scientific research and its standards. In addition to her scientific work, she also supports young researchers to an exceptional degree with her expertise as well as her inspiration and commitment.
Through his research, Perner has laid the foundation for lively and productive theoretical debate. This debate takes up classical philosophical questions and discusses them in the light of new empirical findings: What can we know about the thoughts, feelings and intentions of other people? How is this knowledge formed? What if this knowledge is not acquired? Perner's research on the theory of the mind has inspired numerous studies in related scientific disciplines, such as comparative behavioural research, cognitive neurobiology, and social robotics. He has become a pioneer and architect of a worldwide research network. Thus, in a unique way, Perner exemplifies the concept of interdisciplinary scholarship, to which the Bielefeld Science Prize is particularly committed, in keeping with Luhmann’s own convictions.
The award ceremony took place on 19 November 2010 at the Kunsthalle Bielefeld (Bielefeld Art Museum).
The laudation was delivered by Professor Christoph Markschies.
The award winner gave his lecture on “The sacredness of the person”.
By awarding Hans Joas, the jury recognises one of the most distinguished German sociologists and social philosophers of the so-called "middle generation”.
Internationally renowned, he brought the dimension of action theory, which had been largely neglected since the time of Max Weber, back into the theoretical debates of sociology. Joas does not emphasize social determinacy, but rather the creativity of human action, which is closely related to an identification with cultural values. Through his reception of American pragmatism, he has not only made a lasting contribution to the theoretical debates in sociology, but also to its practical importance in German. Accordingly, his research interests focus primarily on the social dimension of values: Their emergence and change, forms of value communication and their impact in subjective experiences of self-transcendence. He has made significant contributions to the sociology of religion, to the interaction between the emergence of values and the history of violence in the 19th and 20th centuries, and thus also to a sociology of war. His major works have been translated into several languages.
The award ceremony took place on 30 January 2009 at the AudiMax (Bielefeld University).
The laudation was delivered by Professor Axel Honneth.
The award winner gave his lecture on “A genealogy of liberty”
Quentin Skinner has put the history of political ideas on a new footing. He is opposed to a history of ideas that only strives to understand the great works of political philosophy in relation to the canon of Western political thought, thereby ignoring the historical context in which they were created. At the same time, however, he also resolutely rejects a history of ideas that claims to be able to explain a work solely from its context. Because of the inherent conditionality of all works of political philosophy, Skinner also opposes the widespread assumption that there are timeless truths in the history of political ideas that can be drawn on at any time to solve problems. Those who hope to learn from history in this sense, he believes, are mistaken. If they think that the solutions of past great philosophers to fundamental questions can be useful for the present day, they will discover that the answers are formed within such a different temporal or cultural context that it is doubtful whether questions are still the same. However, this does not mean that the history of ideas has no relevance for the present. But, he argues, its relevance lies above and beyond its application to the present. Instead, he argues that engaging with the history of ideas help uncover the conditionality of one's own conceptual world and thus contribute to a more accurate perception of the present. Skinner, therefore, teaches the healthy lesson that “We must learn to do the thinking for ourselves”. Skinner has enthusiastically employed this approach in numerous books and treatises on political philosophy of the early modern period. With his early two-volume work "The Foundations of Modern Political Thought" he became the founder of the so-called Cambridge School of Intellectual History. His books have been published in many editions and translated into many languages. He is now regarded as the world's most outstanding historian of ideas and his historical research also stimulates current discourse. Awarded many times in his career, this is the first time that Skinner has received an award in Germany, despite often being drawn to Germany in the pursuit of his work, in particular to the two Bielefeld scholars Niklas Luhrmann and Reinhart Kosselleck and having spent one year as a Fellow at the Institute for Advanced Study in Berlin.
The award ceremony took place on 15 December 2006 at the City Town Hall in Bielefeld.
The laudation was delivered by Professor Jürgen Habermas.
The award winner gave a lecture on “Interpretation in general”
In awarding this prize, the jury honours Ronald Dworkin, one of the most influential legal philosophers of the present day. Dworkin searched for a “third way” between a a legal positivism that is insensitive to justice and natural law that neglects democratic freedom of decision. Rejecting the positivist dogma of separation between law and morality, he insisted that the lawyer must have recourse to ideal political justice in the interpretation and application of positive law. However, he only allowed for specific legal concepts of justice that are linked to the positive norms and institutions of a particular legal community. For him, fundamental rights, as the most important positive legal expression of ideas of justice, played an important role in this mediation. He dedicated his most important book, “Taking Rights Seriously” to fundamental rights, just as Niklas Luhrmann did, “albeit with a systems theory approach”.
The award ceremony took place on 4 December 2004 at the City Town Hall in Bielefeld.
The laudation was delivered by Professor Jürgen Habermas.
Professor Scharpf gave a lecture on “Political governance today?”.
Renate Mayntz studied in the United States and at the FU Berlin, where she completed her habilitation in 1957. Before her appointment as Founding Director of the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, she was Full Professor of Sociology at the Free University of Berlin, the German University of Administrative Sciences Speyer and the University of Cologne. The internationally renowned scholar has received numerous honours, more recently being elected to Foreign Honorary Member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
Fritz W. Scharpf is a fully qualified lawyer and political scientist. After studying in Tübingen, Freiburg im Breisgau and at Yale Law School, he became Professor of Political Science at the University of Constance, where he established the first course of study in administrative science in the Federal Republic of Germany. From 1973 to 1986 he was Director and Research Professor at the WZB German Social Science Center in Berlin. Through his publications and policy advice, he has contributed to changing political assessments. His honours include the prestigous Johan Skytte Prize of the University of Uppsala.
The jury recognises the internationally outstanding importance of the research on the governance of complex societies, which the two researchers initiated with the establishment and joint management of the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies in Cologne. Within this framework, basic research is conducted aimed at developing an empirical based theory to establish a macrosociology of modern societies. This research focuses on political and social problem-solving forms "between state and market": formation of associations, negotiation systems, policy networks, institutional forms of coordination and mediation of interests, taking into account several political levels, etc. This dynamic research programme was developed through close examination of the key insights of the social theory of the sociologist Niklas Luhmann (1927-1998), who taught in Bielefeld and whom the Bielefeld Science Prize is intended to commemorate. Luhmann's systems theory emphasizes the inherent dynamics and "self-reference" of social systems and the resulting difficulties of governance. The work of Mayntz and Scharpf presupposes these difficulties and attempts to explain how political governance and coordination of collective actors is nevertheless possible. They call their theoretical response "actor-centred institutionalism": organizations are regarded as collective actors operating under certain institutional conditions that may be conducive or detrimental to collective problem solving. This is precisely what needs to be explored empirically. Many younger social scientists have been influenced and supported by the two prizewinners during their work at the institute. Not only have they explored new questions, they have also had a lasting influence on the standards of sociological teaching and research in the Federal Republic of Germany.