skip to main contentskip to main menuskip to footer Universität Bielefeld Play Search
  • The Project

     

    Campus Bielefeld University
    © Universität Bielefeld

Bielefeld Questionnaire on Study Conditions and Health (StudiBiFra)

The Bielefeld Questionnaire on Study Conditions and Health project (duration: 03/21-08/23) was funded by the DGUV research funding programme and carried out by the Health Management Department of Bielefeld University in cooperation with Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin.

Below you will find information on:

Information about the project

As part of this project, the (mental) health of students and, following a relationship-oriented approach, the study conditions as well as other organisational conditions at universities that have a potentially stressful or sponsoring influence are examined. While there are numerous studies on individual influencing factors, such as the health skills or health behaviour of students, there has been less focus on organisational conditions to date. However, analysing these factors is a prerequisite for a risk assessment of mental stress and is essential for deriving structural measures.

For this purpose, the university-specific and relationship-oriented survey instrument "Bielefeld Questionnaire on Study Conditions and Health" is being used at universities nationwide and further developed in parallel based on practical experience. In this way, organisational resources and stresses at the universities surveyed that influence the (mental) health of students can be identified. Based on the resulting findings, stress factors can be reduced with sustainable concepts and programmes (e.g. in the context of risk assessments of mental stress) and resource factors can be developed accordingly. Surveyed universities are systematically networked within the framework of this project and can exchange information in regular hits of the university network and benefit from an exchange of experiences and shared "lessons learnt " relating to the survey process.

A further aim of the practical application is the development of a university database on study conditions and health. In order to enable the surveyed universities to better categorise their results, comparative values will be generated as a benchmark for participating universities. Based on the data obtained from the nationwide student surveys, initial cross-university trends and prevention approaches can also be derived. The research questions essentially relate to organisational factors, i.e. framework conditions that can be influenced by the universities. Accordingly, no focus is placed on personal framework conditions and the framework conditions of other organisations, such as the Studierendenwerk [Association for Student Affairs], are not initially focused on.

 

  1. Which framework and study conditions at universities are associated with the mental health of students and are there factors that in turn influence these associations?
  2. Which specific organisational factors ("drivers") have the strongest influence (resources and stresses) on the mental health of students at universities and are therefore starting points for measures? Where do students see the main need for action? What opportunities for synergies (common "levers") can be identified for relationship prevention from a joint consideration of data from surveys at workplaces and study places as a whole?
  3. Can the Bielefeld company model based on the social capital approach be adapted in relation to study conditions?

 

Projectmanagement

The overall project is managed and coordinated by Bielefeld University's Health Management department. Not only can it look back on a long and successful tradition in the field of health - in 1994, for example, Bielefeld University was the first university to define health promotion for employees and students as a central target area of its organisational culture and was awarded the Corporate Health Award in the "Healthy University" category in 2013 for outstanding academic achievements in health management. Since then, Bielefeld University has also repeatedly acted as a driving force for trends and developments in the field of health management at universities.

In addition, Bielefeld University's health management team has already carried out extensive preparatory work for this project, which is now being built upon: The commitment to the topic area of risk assessment of mental stress was sponsored by the Unfallkasse (UK) NRW with third-party funding from 2013 to 2016. The result was the development, testing and validation of a questionnaire adapted to the university context to assess psychosocial stress and resources in the university workplace, as well as the development and initial testing of a university-specific and sustainable procedure for dealing with psychosocial stress and resources in the university workplace. As part of subsequent funding from the DGUV's research funding programme from 2016 to 2019, the instrument was used nationwide and a comprehensive database was established.


 

During the current project period, Bielefeld University is focussing on advising, supporting and networking interested and surveying universities in all aspects of the survey process. In addition to the optimal adaptation of the respective survey and framing processes to the specific circumstances and conditions of the surveying university, this also includes support in the preparation of follow-up processes relating to the communication of results and the derivation of measures, as well as the moderation of the university network and invitations to regular exchange meetings.

Bielefeld University is also responsible for the systematic further development of the questionnaire (in the sense of a "learning instrument") as part of the practical trials. The further development takes place in close coordination with the cooperation partners at Charité Berlin and, in addition to important impulses from the practice of the surveying universities, primarily takes up relevant (e.g. social or higher education policy) developments - such as the current significant changes in study conditions due to the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.


 

The project management is the responsibility of the health management coordinator, Julia Burian (M.Sc. Psychologist). As an occupational and organisational psychologist and solution-focused consultant and thanks to her many years of previous work in the research projects on the Bielefeld questionnaire for employees at universities sponsored by the UK NRW and the DGUV, among others, she has sound practical experience that she can draw on when supervising the further development of the questionnaire and advising and networking universities.

In addition, Zita Deptolla (B.Sc. Sociologist) supports the focal points located at Bielefeld University. Due to her parallel work in the project on the Bielefeld questionnaire for employees at universities, she also has relevant practical experience and can also point out interfaces and synchronisation possibilities in the context of survey coordination, university networking and adaptation of the survey instrument to the respective circumstances.


The persons to contact at Bielefeld University can be reached at fragebogen-studierende@uni-bielefeld.de.

 

Researchmanagement

The IGPW of Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, one of the leading medical Faculties in Europe and a member of the Berlin University Alliance and recognised as a University of Excellence, is responsible for the scientific coordination of the project. Prof Dr Christiane Stock and Dr Katherina Heinrichs will contribute their expertise in terms of content and research methodology to this project. Both researchers have been conducting research in the field of student health and health promotion in the university setting for many years, have already realised a large number of important projects in this area and thus contribute broad research experience in the field of conducting surveys and statistically analysing survey data as well as in the development, implementation and evaluation of interventions in the university setting. In addition, as a health scientist, Jennifer Lehnchen implements the focal points located at Charité Berlin and is the contact person for survey analyses and the cross-university database, among other things.


 

The cooperation partners at Charité Berlin are primarily responsible for conducting the online surveys using the "Lime Survey" platform and subsequently analysing and processing the survey results for the respective universities surveyed. This data is optimised for independent use at the universities in order to enable long-term continuity of the processes beyond the project period, among other things.

Charité Berlin is also responsible for the design, development and maintenance of a cross-university database on study conditions and health. On the one hand, this serves to create comparative values in the sense of an external benchmark, which is reported back to the surveyed universities in addition to their own survey results. On the other hand, the cross-university comparative values are used to formulate initial statements on conditions at study places, which, among other things, provide accident insurance institutions with specific information on central sources of stress and resources of students and can thus justify prioritisation, e.g. in the area of situational prevention. This also includes - in close coordination with Bielefeld University's health management - the development and implementation of a corresponding research strategy and the preparation of research results for communication to the (subject) public.


 

Research support group

The project will be accompanied throughout its entire duration by an independent advisory research committee. This committee was put together with the involvement of diverse and relevant expertise from science and practice and explicitly includes the perspective of the target group of students themselves. Regular exchanges and the use of the expertise pooled here serve to ensure quality assurance and support the achievement of this project's objectives.

The support group is made up of the following members:

  • Fritz, Bente Marie (B. Sc. programme in Health Sciences, Charité Berlin)
  • Grumbach, Hans-Joachim, Dr (Department of Universities and Research Institutions, DGUV)
  • Huxholl, Hannah (Department "Safety and Health", DGUV)
  • Maas, Lena (M. Sc. Psychology programme, Bielefeld University)
  • Mikolajczyk, Rafael, Prof. Dr (Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biometry and Informatics, MLU Halle)
  • Orrie, Andrew (Department "Safety and Health", DGUV)
  • Pischke, Claudia, Prof. Dr (Institute for Medical Sociology, HHU Düsseldorf)
  • Ender, Loreen (Department of Universities, UK NRW)

The Results

The further developed Bielefeld questionnaire on study conditions has been tested very successfully in practice and is of high quality and applicability. Within the project period, the research project generated a comprehensive and meaningful data set from 13 universities, which enables robust conclusions to be drawn and adequately reflects the breadth of the German higher education landscape. The most important results are summarised below.

The survey results were analysed and processed by our cooperation partner, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin.


The final report of the project, which is published in the DGUV's project directory under "Further information", contains a detailed presentation of the research results.


 

Description of the sample

Size
Befragungen von Juni 2021 – März 2023; 13 Hochschulen; 24.533 (11,4%) auswertbare Fragebögen; 15.319 (7,1%) vollständig ausgefüllte Fragebögen
© Universität Bielefeld

As part of the StudiBiFra project, 29,166 students at 13 universities in Germany took part in the survey period (June 2021 to March 2023) (average response rate = 13.5 %). In the course of data set cleansing, 4,633 questionnaires were excluded, so that 24,533 questionnaires were included in the following analyses (average response rate = 11.4 %). This figure includes the data of all students who completed at least the first page of the questionnaire. 15,319 students answered all the questions on the questionnaire (average response rate = 7.1 %).

Geschlecht: 66,9% weiblich; 31,3 % männlich; 1,8% divers; Alter: 69% unter 25 Jahre; 19,2% zwischen 26-30 Jahren, 9% zwischen 31-40 Jahren; 2,4% über 40 Jahre
© Universität Bielefeld

Overall, around two thirds of the participants were women and staff, people aged 25 or under. Almost one in six students had children or relatives to supervise. A small proportion (2.2%) of the students surveyed stated that they had a severe disability or equal status in accordance with Section 2 SGB.

Distribution of sample among the federal states: North Rhine-Westphalia 9,911 (40.4) Berlin 6,722 (27.4) Lower Saxony 2,208 (9.0) Saxony-Anhalt 2,110 (8.6) Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania 1,693 (6.9) Baden-Württemberg 785 (3.2) Bavaria 662 (2.7) Thuringia 442 (1.8)
© Universität Bielefeld

The participating universities were located in eight federal states, with the majority of staff, people studying at four universities in North Rhine-Westphalia and three universities in Berlin.

Verteilung der Stichprobe auf die Subgruppen: Fächerguppen, Studienphase und Hochschultyp
© Universität Bielefeld

Almost one in six participants studied at a University of Applied Sciences (UAS). Over half were studying in the subject group (FG) Education, Humanities, Social Sciences, Behavioural Sciences, Economics, Media, Law, Languages, Arts and Culture. Around a quarter were studying in their first or second semester, and almost one in six planned to finish their studies in the current or following semester. A good one in three students reported that they were the first person in their own family to study at a university.

How are the students doing?

Research question 1

Which framework and study conditions at universities are associated with the mental health of students (differentiated according to different study phases and degree programmes) and are there factors that in turn influence these associations?

Darstellung des Textes als Grafik
© Universität Bielefeld

Key findings: All 22 topic blocks of the framework/study conditions are significantly associated with the four mental health outcomes , mostly in the medium to high correlation range. If the framework/study conditions are assessed as worse, the students also report restrictions in their mental health (well-being, depression, stress, exhaustion). This correlation is particularly clear for the outcome of exhaustion. Analysing the correlations separately by study phase, subject group and gender shows that these factors hardly influence the associations between framework/study conditions and mental health.

Research question 2

Which specific organisational factors ("drivers") have the strongest influence (resources and stresses) on the mental health of students at the university and are therefore starting points for measures?

Darstellung des Textes als Grafik
© Universität Bielefeld

Key findings: The organisational factors of time demands and examination and study requirements / credits show the strongest associations with students' mental health, especially with exhaustion. They can therefore provide concrete starting points for measures: The absence of competitive / rivalry situations or the cooperation between students and how easy it is for the students surveyed to make social connections can be described as particular resources for student cooperation that need to be further strengthened at universities. The factors of coping with multiple burdens (also due to private demands) and time pressure, module examinations, their preparation and the high learning workload are shown to be particular burdens that need to be minimised.

Research question 2a

Where do students see the main need for action?

Bielefeld University
© Universität Bielefeld

Key findings: From the students' point of view, the main areas where action is needed are career prospects, time requirements and examination and study requirements / credits.

Where do students see the least need for action?

Universität Bielefeld
© Universität Bielefeld

Key findings: Students see the least need for action in the areas of quality of student cooperation, culture in the university and task-related support from teaching staff, instructors, lectures.

Which subgroups of students require more action?

Universität Bielefeld
© Universität Bielefeld

Key findings: The differentiated analysis also displays that the following groups express more need for action on average than their respective comparison groups: students who identify as gender-diverse, students in the last two semesters of their degree programme and students at universities (vs. universities of applied sciences). When looking at students from different subject groups, no clear pattern is apparent. However, there is, for example, less urgent need for action regarding the meaningfulness of the degree programme and appointment prospects among students of medicine and health sciences.

Research question 2b

What opportunities for synergies (joint "adjusting screws") can be identified for ratio prevention from a joint consideration of data from surveys of workplaces and study places as a whole?

Key findings: As only one university conducted a parallel survey during the project period, this research question cannot be answered conclusively. However, it is becoming apparent that there are various parallels in the respective processes, so that synergies can be assumed in future parallel surveys. Effective communication between representatives from SGM and BGM and transparent handling of the survey results can make it easier to overcome key challenges and hurdles.

Research question 3

Can the Bielefeld enterprise model based on the social capital approach be adapted to study conditions?

Universität Bielefeld
© Universität Bielefeld

Key findings: Since all framework and study conditions are highly significantly associated with the considered effects quality of study requirements / credits, well-being during studies and identification with studies and the university (p < 0.001), the Bielefeld Enterprise Model can be adapted to study conditions.

COVID-19 pandemic

What impact has the COVID-19 pandemic had?

Universität Bielefeld
© Universität Bielefeld

Key findings: The majority of students report reduced social contact and cohesion in their degree programme due to the COVID-19 pandemic. More than half note that motivation is difficult due to the switch to digital teaching and that universities have created few opportunities to get to know each other (online). Students who were surveyed under stricter COVID-19 measures rate the items in the COVID-19 topic block more negatively overall and appear to be more burdened than students who completed the questionnaire during a period of nationwide easing.

This website was automatically translated.

back to top